Back to Home
PredictionsSecurity Guide2026 Preview

OWASP LLM Top 10
2026 Predictions

Stay ahead of emerging AI security threats. Based on current trends in agentic AI, multi-modal models, and persistent memory features, here's what we predict for the OWASP LLM Top 10 2026.

View Current 2025 ListAnalysis based on 2024-2025 security research

Key Trends Driving 2026 Changes

Agentic AI

Autonomous agents with real-world permissions

Multi-Modal

Vision, audio, and document processing

Memory & Context

Persistent conversations and personalization

Tool Integration

MCP, function calling, and external APIs

2025 vs 2026 Comparison

How we predict the OWASP LLM Top 10 will evolve

#2025 (Current)2026 (Predicted)Status
01Prompt Injection
Prompt Injection
Same
02Sensitive Information Disclosure
Sensitive Information Disclosure
Same
03Supply Chain
Agent Hijacking
New
04Data and Model Poisoning
Supply Chain
Down
05Improper Output Handling
Data and Model Poisoning
Down
06Excessive Agency
Multi-Modal Injection
New
07System Prompt Leakage
Excessive Agency
Up
08Vector and Embedding Weaknesses
System Prompt Leakage
Down
09Misinformation
Vector and Embedding Weaknesses
Down
10Unbounded Consumption
Memory Persistence Attacks
New
New for 2026

Predicted New Vulnerabilities

These emerging threats are expected to debut in the 2026 OWASP LLM Top 10 based on current attack research and industry trends

Predicted #3Critical
Agent Hijacking

Attackers compromise autonomous AI agents to perform unauthorized actions—browsing malicious sites, executing code, making purchases, or attacking other systems on behalf of the user.

Why this is coming:

  • OpenAI, Anthropic, Google all pushing agentic capabilities in 2025-2026
  • Agents granted real-world permissions: file access, web browsing, API calls, code execution
  • One compromised agent can cascade attacks across entire systems
  • Limited human oversight in autonomous workflows

First AI Cyber Espionage Campaign (2024)

Anthropic reported hackers used Claude to automate sophisticated attack chains. The AI was given excessive permissions enabling autonomous exploitation.

Tool Confusion Attacks

Researchers demonstrated agents can be tricked via 'tool confusion'—manipulating which tools the agent calls and with what parameters, leading to data exfiltration.

Prepare now:

  • Implement strict permission boundaries for all agent actions
  • Require human approval for sensitive operations (payments, deletions, external API calls)
  • Monitor and log all autonomous agent activities
  • Use allowlists for permitted domains, APIs, and file paths
Predicted #6Critical
Multi-Modal Injection

Prompt injection attacks delivered via images, audio, video, or documents rather than text. Hidden instructions embedded in pixels, audio frequencies, steganography, or file metadata.

Why this is coming:

  • GPT-4V, Gemini, Claude now process images natively—attack surface expanded
  • Voice AI (phone bots, assistants) growing rapidly in customer service
  • PDFs, spreadsheets, and documents routinely processed by LLMs
  • Traditional text-based defenses don't catch visual/audio attacks

Invisible Image Prompts (2024)

Researchers embedded white-on-white text in images that was invisible to humans but read by GPT-4V, successfully hijacking the model's behavior.

Audio Adversarial Examples

Demonstrated attacks where inaudible frequencies in audio files caused speech-to-text systems to transcribe hidden malicious commands.

Prepare now:

  • Implement image/document sanitization before LLM processing
  • Use separate, sandboxed models for multi-modal content analysis
  • Strip metadata and re-encode uploaded files
  • Apply content filtering to extracted text from images/audio
Predicted #10Critical
Memory Persistence Attacks

Exploiting LLM memory and context persistence features to plant malicious instructions that survive across sessions, enabling long-term surveillance, data exfiltration, or behavior manipulation.

Why this is coming:

  • ChatGPT memory feature now widely adopted by millions of users
  • Custom GPTs and enterprise deployments maintain persistent context
  • Conversation history used for personalization creates attack surface
  • Users trust persistent context without verifying its integrity

ChatGPT Memory Poisoning (2024)

Security researchers demonstrated persistent prompt injection that survived in ChatGPT's memory for weeks, continuously exfiltrating data across unrelated conversations.

Custom GPT Backdoors

Malicious actors created Custom GPTs with hidden persistent instructions that activated after specific triggers, evading initial review.

Prepare now:

  • Implement memory content validation and sanitization
  • Allow users to audit and clear persistent context
  • Isolate memory between different security domains
  • Monitor for anomalous patterns in stored context

Expanded & Elevated Threats

Existing vulnerabilities expected to receive expanded coverage in 2026

Excessive Agency

Elevated to Top 7

As agentic AI becomes mainstream in 2026, the risks of autonomous AI taking unauthorized actions will escalate dramatically. Expect expanded coverage of tool use boundaries, permission escalation, and cross-agent trust issues.

New focus areas:

Multi-agent coordination risks

Tool use permission models

Autonomous decision auditing

System Prompt Leakage

Remains Critical

With more valuable IP embedded in system prompts (pricing logic, proprietary workflows, competitive intelligence), attacks will intensify. New extraction techniques targeting agentic systems expected.

New focus areas:

Agent instruction theft

Multi-step extraction chains

Prompt reconstruction attacks

Vector and Embedding Weaknesses

Expanded Scope

As RAG becomes the default architecture (53% of companies use RAG over fine-tuning), vector database poisoning and embedding manipulation attacks will mature.

New focus areas:

Cross-tenant data leakage in shared vector DBs

Embedding backdoors

Retrieval manipulation

How does ScanMyLLM help you fix these risks?

Prompt injection detection

We test 15+ injection techniques and show you which succeed, with code-level fixes to block them

System prompt extraction

We attempt to leak your instructions, then provide hardening strategies that actually work

Output validation gaps

We identify where unfiltered responses enable exploits, with sanitization patterns you can copy-paste

Full remediation playbook

Every finding includes severity rating, exploit proof, and step-by-step fix guidance your devs can implement immediately

Vulnerabilities identified. Fixes included. Delivered in 48 hours.